However, while the
industry continues to play this role and make significant progress, the
newspaper faces a very challenging future unless they change the way they
operate. While in the past, threats for newspaper survival would come from
failing to compete with a rival newspaper or from cases of litigation for
sedition, defamation and slander, the new threat and perhaps the biggest has
emerged from the technological advancement.
As the world advances
technologically, more and more people are gaining access to the internet. This
has worked to the advantage of the electronic newsletters while placing the
newspaper in a tight corner. Thus as more people gain access to the internet,
the electronic newsletters are becoming their first source of information. This
is not only because of the ease of use and their ability to report in real
time, but also because most electronic Newsletters offer an interactive
service.
The flourishing of
these newsletters therefore call for a redefinition of the role which
newspapers must play in the modern world. Newspaper editors and their teams
need to realize that while other businesses rely heavily on their marketing
teams to create an appealing brand, the appeal in a newspaper largely depends
on the creativity of the editors and their journalists. News editors should not
only be preoccupied with editing for style or just ensuring that a writer has a
balanced story. Editors must realize that increasing the shelf life of the
paper as well as ensuring that their readers are not being given stale news is
equally as important. Unfortunately, with the coming of the electronic media,
newspapers have failed to adjust and take their proper role. The result thus
has been that readers have been forced to feast on stale news.
It is my opinion
therefore that the newspaper industry has to redefine its role from that of
reporting to that of focusing on effort and resources on investigating,
analyzing and reporting. The modern day journalist needs to go further than
just presenting an account of what has happened. He/she has to place more
emphasis on the why and not necessarily what or the how if the print press is
to remain relevant as a source of information. It is a known fact that the curiosity
to know what has happened is what drives the media industry. The readers
therefore do not find any value to read stories in the newspaper which they
have already read online. What would be valuable to the modern readers then, is
continuity of the stories they have read on the internet or seen on the
television in form of analysis and not necessarily the story itself.
In an effort to meet
date-lines, possibly with the view of presenting a story that is timely,
journalists have ended up regurgitating what has already been written or
presented by the electronic/online media. For instance one may need to look at
how the Malawian media handled the KIPs tragedy. While the TV, the radio and
all social networks were awash with the tragic news, one would have expected
the newspaper to take a different angle-one that would expose what really
happened and why it happened. However, all the morning papers just wrote what
almost every Malawian already knew-that there has been a tragedy at KIPs in
Blantyre. Usually, such stories have only managed to sell because of either
brand loyalty on part of the customer or because of the curiosity that the
situation had created otherwise without any new information, the papers failed
to provide value for money to their readers. This has been a consistent failure
by the newspaper industry and the one that needs to be seriously looked into if
the industry is to survive the online boom.
The Malawian newspaper
journalist therefore must adjust to start writing their stories beyond the
usual inverted pyramid style and be able to report based on what the readers
might want to know.
Examples are there
of companies that have ended up struggling due to their failure to adapt to
technological advancement - Malawi Posts Corporation might be a good example.
It would be sad if the Malawian newspaper failed to adjust and ended up in a
similar situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment